Grounding
Annual wildfire risk to buildings:
0.010.050.10.250.51% a year, average per county

Open Climate Risk v1.1.0, CarbonPlan

IEEE ClimateChain Global Hackathon 2026 · Climate Data & Environmental Monitoring

Climate claims that can show their work.

A reported climate figure is usually just a number. Grounding turns it into a record you can check: the evidence, the figure rebuilt from it, every call a person made, and a signature that breaks if anything changes.

You are the verifier. Pick a claim: it is rebuilt in your browser, you record your verdict and sign it, and anyone can verify the record.

Six claims waiting for review

Findings from rechecking the evidence; not an assurance opinion.

On the map

  • (site-level point, not the building itself)
  • (outlined)
  • (dashed states). The records name 105 projects; the pinned project list places 13 of them in US states and 1 outside the US. The other 91 have no location in the committed records.
  • : wildfire risk to buildings, by county, tract and block, and for each building when you zoom in; "Change" shows where it rises or falls by ~2047.

Also on the map: the battery cell's test site, NASA Ames, and the energy forecast's market, the whole of India. Not on the map: the company disclosure, whose page names no site. (Overture Maps Places has one "LPL Construction Ltd", in Alberta, Canada, with nothing tying it to the claim, so it is not used.)

How it works

  1. 1

    A claim comes in

    with its evidence: meter data, a registry export, a satellite scene, a company's own page.

  2. 2

    It is rechecked

    Grounding rebuilds the figure from that evidence, in your browser, and flags data that looks wrong.

  3. 3

    A person decides

    each flag, and the claim itself, gets a named decision tied to the exact data it was made on.

  4. 4

    It is signed

    the evidence, the decisions and the result become one record, signed with Ed25519 and post-quantum ML-DSA-65.

  5. 5

    Anyone verifies

    open the record on any computer. Change one number in it and the signatures no longer match.

Why a number on its own isn't enough

  1. You see the total. You don't see the meter readings, the emission factor, or the readings someone left out.
  2. You can't tell who decided what about the odd data, or whether anything changed after they did.
  3. Putting it on a blockchain proves a record wasn't changed. It doesn't prove the number was right.

How it fits your work →

Third-party data is shown or bundled only where its licence allows, with attribution. Map data: OpenFreeMap, OpenStreetMap, Open Climate Risk (CarbonPlan), Overture Maps.